“Abductees,” why was kidnapped?

Although the U.S. Coast Guard commander of the stuffed Allen confirmed that starting from June 9, BP (the BP) oil spill plan to collect the initial success of the current 15,000 barrels per day of crude oil was collected. But the American public still can not get happier. Because the images taken from the deep sea, each person with normal vision can see the number of oil spills is not significantly reduced. The U.S. government had to increase the leakage of crude oil is expected that the leakage of crude oil a day may not BP estimated 19,000 barrels, 40,000 barrels but terrible. The BP is ridiculous initially expected 1,000 barrels, the company’s CEO Hayward has used the “very, very mild” to describe the oil spills.

British mocked adverse impacts. Survey data show that 62% of Americans do not recognize the government’s disaster relief mode, angry people tend to feel that the U.S. government’s attitude towards BP weak and questionable. Under such pressure, the relief work of Coast Guard commander has had to do everything possible to admit that they slow to respond to grievances, President Obama publicly as “I know who kick ass” so rare harsh rhetoric elution own suspicion of partiality. Permeates between the Department of the Interior, the Ministry of Justice, including the Federal Bureau of Investigation, including, and are taking on BP’s civil, criminal investigations, jointly with the affected states had huge claims for compensation. For a time, BP seems precarious, apart from these also reported the rumor of insolvency.

BP’s arrogant and emboldened

Thunder Fury superpower, not to BP, as people outside think that kind of panic. Until June 16, BP chairman Kevin thought Obama was the first time the two sides held talks. The late meeting from April 20 blast has been well the past two months apart. BP’s attitude is very clear that the 2009 profit of 16 billion U.S. dollars of the company, the ability and willingness to pay for the losses caused by oil spill, but the Americans expected an apology, is not considered within the context of the company. What gives the company enough lung power, such as the United States can not make it a powerful low arrogant head.

We first have to admit that, as a powerful multinational corporations, BP has the ability to withstand large-scale emergency disaster. Before the outbreak spill, BP’s market capitalization is 107 billion U.S. dollars, although there is evaporation of nearly 82 billion U.S. dollars, but the company’s profitability has not suffered. As an energy company a market value of the evaporation is more direct damage to the interests of stockholders, BP, you can rely on global oil and gas resources around the property through a long crisis.

In addition to external economies of scale and ability to repay, BP’s bottom line more distinct from its political sphere, but may be abnormal and accurate understanding. As an experienced multinational corporations, governments perennial deal with all kinds, BP will not spill the political and social effects of fermentation of the most basic foresight. The public relations firm in the crisis in the poor performance, in fact, can only be explained by arrogance or disdain.

The face of the United States, BP’s confidence than many of the international power to no less, because it is convinced he will get political support, or that it hard to understand the attitude the U.S. government’s bottom line.

In the BP seems, even if the outbreak in oil spill on the bear all the charges, and sincerely apologize to the American public still can not escape the intense public blame the United States, after all, have at least 170 million liters of oil leaked out. Since the apology will make the company into a more compensation can not be a bargaining position, in that case deliberately overlooked aphasia using near-backed downs, sent the Americans to a degree, one for the home country that the British Empire, its people being bullied, and then had to the degree of involvement, so that we can use politics works to reduce the company’s deal with the cost of transferring and diluting the companies face enormous pressure.

From the British Government’s point of view, the new prime minister in waiting for Cameron it not such a good opportunity, if not an American so he’s Koubuzeyan, touched the nerves of British nationalism, Cameron would like to convince economic difficulties of the British people to a company’s sloppy construction and management of accident pay thing.

June 11, Craig Cameron, Deputy Prime Minister Prime Minister and the singing of the two-man, the Prime Minister claimed that President Obama call to discuss the matter and undertook to assist the BP oil spill clean-up; Kim warned that the intense U.S. attitude may lead to the British reaction, the two countries should strive to avoid “amplifiers diplomacy” occurred. British politicians and mainstream media have rallied together to respond, claiming that the U.S. BP’s attitude “bad, emotional and anti-British.”

British Government’s attitude to the Gulf of Mexico oil spill entered a new stage of development, not only back up BP’s shares fell 7%, leveraging the power of the technique also a result of poor management of the environmental disaster into a political of inter-country relations. It got to the point, certainly with the hope that punish BP American civilians against the original intention, but it is not the gospel of the American government.

“Abductees,” why was kidnapped? (hesco barrier

The U.S. government is hated BP is not a problem, the real question is, when the crisis ended, the U.S. government to continue to maintain and multinational companies such as the relationship between BP. Like a person might hate it, but difficult for him to completely abandon their, U.S. government and BP Qi Shi Gong was born in the U.S. political system is that the two tree The branches.

With media, the United States House and Senate lawmakers have been substantial political donations BP, as the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee this vital sector is the focus of its donor. Over the past 20 years, BP has also provided the U.S. presidential candidates more than 350 million total sponsorship, the largest of which is to the current president Obama. Even the United States is prepared to resort to the law on the oil spill, also found the five states along the Gulf Coast Coalition of 64 judges, at least 37 people have an interest because the energy associated with the consortium may not eligible for the trial. These are the operation of American political and judicial system, the reality, but it does not belong to some media claims of “corruption” category.

The political ecology in the United States government departments, politicians and large companies, especially large multinational companies in close cooperation with Guanxi, the effective functioning of state machinery is a basic guarantee.

Historically, the development from the United States, the United States fortunes already and the expansion of these transnational integration. Even as Obama determined to follow the example of Franklin Roosevelt to strengthen supervision of state intervention and market president, also had a huge economic stimulus package, for those responsible for the economic crisis, large companies have set aside the share of taxes.

In essence, entrepreneurship represents the essence of the American Dream, Americans against the government than against entrepreneurs. Without the support of multinational capital, not to capital, opening the cornerstone of international strategy, the United States will not secure a strong global position. As long as the United States is an open international system, the leader with the symbiotic relationship between the interests of multinational corporations on the unchangeable. This accumulation of history and reality demands the U.S. government’s attitude has always been careful treatment of multinational corporations.

BP is not a U.S. company, but over the years with the U.S. government has been formed between the close relations of cooperation. Mistakes when dealing with BP, the U.S. government and multinational companies need to follow the special group had reached a tacit understanding of other multinational companies also need to consider the feelings, which is the U.S. global strategy and national identity decision.

Today, multinational companies have been in charge of the world’s 1 / 3 production and 2 / 3 of international trade, they more than any time in history a more profound impact on the development and welfare of the world. But whether they are aware of their responsibilities and obligations, from the Mexican oil spill, we can not find the positive answer.

BP in this case paid a heavy price, believe that other multinational giants have enough lessons to be learned. But if we are not stingy with the pessimistic attitude of consideration, they would find a strong enough relative to their national game and the ability to run, too few constraints to make a major error committed multinational soil is still fertile. BP mistakes in environmental protection, and Goldman Sachs in Europe, the role of sovereign debt crisis as disgraceful, but they have found enough political asylum.

BP’s fate like a ridiculous story, because its assets accounted for 10% of UK GDP, because the 1 / 7 of the British pension bought it with stock, so contrary to the British committed a major error in it, and caused a huge loss of British shareholders after it came forward to defend the cost-sharing instead of penalize it. When this interest has been established and climactic Bangjia, multinational corporations in the absurdity of the story at any time anywhere in the world staged.

(In the ocean of young scholars, “China Economic Weekly” columnist, Jilin University to teach. Main research interests: international inequality studies, the International Risk Management.)

Gulf oil spill gate: BP fate of the kidnapped British and the United States? !

June 22, 2010

“Abductees,” why was kidnapped?

Although the U.S. Coast Guard commander of the stuffed Allen confirmed that from June 9, the British oil company (hereinafter referred to as BP) oil spill plan to collect the initial success of the current 15,000 barrels per day of crude oil was collected. But the American public still can not get happier. Because the images taken from the deep sea, each person with normal vision can see the number of oil spills is not significantly reduced. The U.S. government had to increase the leakage of crude oil is expected that the leakage of crude oil a day may not BP estimated 19,000 barrels, 40,000 barrels but terrible. The BP is ridiculous initially expected 1,000 barrels, the company’s CEO Hayward has used the “very, very mild” to describe the oil spills.

British mocked adverse impacts. Survey data hesco barrier, 62% of Americans do not recognize the government’s disaster relief means anger of Minzhong tend to feel that the U.S. government Duidai BP’s 态度 weak and questionable. Under such pressure, the relief work of Coast Guard commanders have tried our best to acknowledge their grievances had to slow to respond, President Obama also open with “I know who kick ass” so rare harsh rhetoric elution own suspicion of partiality. Permeates between the Department of the Interior, the Ministry of Justice, including the Federal Bureau of Investigation, including, and are taking on BP’s civil, criminal investigations, jointly with the affected states had huge claims for compensation. For a time, BP seems precarious, apart from these also spread the rumor of insolvency.

BP’s arrogant and emboldened

Thunder Fury superpower, not to BP, as people outside think that kind of panic. Until June 16, BP chairman Kevin thought Obama was the first time the two sides held talks. The meeting came in late, from the oil well explosion on April 20 has been separated for nearly two months. BP’s attitude is very clear that the 2009 profit of 16 billion U.S. dollars of the company, the ability and willingness to pay for the losses caused by oil spill, but the Americans expected an apology, not to be considered within the context of the company. What gives the company enough lung power, such as the United States can not make it a powerful low arrogant head.

We first have to admit that, as a powerful multinational corporations, hesco barrierBP has the ability to withstand large-scale emergency disaster. Before the outbreak spill, BP’s market capitalization is 107 billion U.S. dollars, although there is evaporation of nearly 82 billion U.S. dollars, but the company’s profitability has not suffered. As an energy company a market value of the evaporation is more direct damage to the interests of stockholders, BP, you can rely on global oil and gas resources around the property through a long crisis.

In addition to external economies of scale and ability to repay, BP’s bottom line more distinct from its political sphere, but an accurate understanding of possible exceptions. As an experienced multinational corporations, governments perennial deal with all kinds, BP will not spill the political and social effects of fermentation of the most basic foresight. The public relations firm in the crisis in the poor performance, in fact, can only be explained by arrogance or disdain.

The face of the United States, BP’s confidence than many of the international power to no less, because it is convinced he will get political support, or that it hard to understand the attitude the U.S. government’s bottom line.

In the BP seems, even if the outbreak in oil spill on the bear all the charges, and sincerely apologize to the American people, is still not escape the intense public blame the U.S., after all, have at least 170 million liters of oil leaked out. Since the apology will make the company more in terms of compensation can not be caught in a bargaining position, that is not nearly as deliberate neglect with aphasia deeply moved by the Americans to a degree, one for the home country of the British Empire feel bullied by their subjects, and then had to intervene the extent, then they can use politics works, reducing the company to recover costs, transfer and thin companies face enormous pressure.

From the British Government’s point of view, the new Prime Minister Cameron is this not waiting for a suitable opportunity, if not an American so he’s Koubuzeyan, touched the nerve of British nationalism, Cameron would like to convince economic difficulties of the British people to a company’s sloppy construction and management of accident pay thing. hesco barrier

June 11, Craig Cameron, Deputy Prime Minister Prime Minister and the singing of the two-man, the Prime Minister claimed that President Obama call to discuss the matter and undertook to assist the BP oil spill clean-up; Kim warned that the intense U.S. attitude may lead to the British reaction, the two countries should strive to avoid “amplifiers diplomacy” occurred. British politicians and mainstream media have rallied together to respond, claiming that the U.S. BP’s attitude “bad, emotional and anti-British.”

British Government’s attitude to the Gulf of Mexico oil spill entered a new stage of development, not only back up BP’s shares fell 7%, leveraging the power of the technique also a result of poor management of the environmental disaster and turned into political relations between countries. It got to the point, certainly with the hope that punish BP American civilians against the original intention, but it is not the gospel of the American government.

“Abductees,” why was kidnapped?

The U.S. government is hated BP is not a problem, the real question is, when the crisis ended, the U.S. government to continue to maintain and multinational companies such as the relationship between BP. Like a person may hate himself, but he is difficult to completely abandon their own, like BP is the U.S. government and political system were born in the United States this tree The branches on the two.

With media, the U.S. House and Senate lawmakers have been substantial political donations BP, as the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee this vital sector is the focus of its donor. Over the past 20 years, BP has also provided the U.S. presidential candidates more than 350 million total sponsorship, the largest of which is to the current president Obama. Even the United States is prepared to resort to the law on the oil spill, also found that the five states along the Gulf Coast Coalition of 64 judges, at least 37 people have an interest because the energy associated with the consortium but the trial may not be eligible. These are the operation of American political and judicial system, the reality, but it does not belong to some media claims of “corruption” category.

The political environment in the United States, the government departments, politicians and large companies in particular, the close cooperation between large multinational companies, in fact, the effective functioning of the state machine the basic guarantee.

Historically, the development from the United States, the United States and those fortunes already integrated the expansion of multinational corporations. Even as Obama determined to follow the example of Franklin Roosevelt to strengthen supervision of state intervention and market president, also had a huge economic stimulus package for those responsible for the economic crisis, large companies have set aside the share of taxes.

In essence, entrepreneurship represents the essence of the American Dream, Americans against the government than against entrepreneurs. Without the support of multinational capital, not to capital, opening the cornerstone of international strategy, the United States will not secure a strong global position. As long as the United States is an open international system, the leader with the symbiotic relationship between the interests of multinational companies on the unchangeable. This accumulation of history and reality demands the U.S. government’s attitude has always been careful treatment of multinational corporations.

BP is not a U.S. company, but over the years with the U.S. government has been formed between the close relations of cooperation. Mistakes when dealing with BP, the U.S. government and multinational companies need to follow the special group had reached a tacit understanding of other multinational companies also need to consider the feelings, which is the U.S. global strategy and national identity decision. hesco barrier

Today, multinational companies have been in charge of the world’s 1 / 3 production and 2 / 3 of international trade, they more than any time in history a more profound impact on the development and welfare of the world. But whether they are aware of their responsibilities and obligations, from the Mexican oil spill, we can not find the positive answer.

BP in this case paid a heavy price, believe that other multinational giants have enough lessons to be learned. But if we are not stingy with the pessimistic attitude of consideration, they would find a strong enough relative to their ability and Country Game terms of too few hesco barrier that transnational corporations have committed a major error in the soil is still fertile. BP mistakes in environmental protection, and Goldman Sachs in Europe, the role of sovereign debt crisis as disgraceful, but they have found enough political asylum.

BP’s fate like a ridiculous story, because its assets accounted for 10% of UK GDP, because the 1 / 7 of the British pension bought it with stock, so the British but to be a major mistake in it, and caused huge losses after the British shareholders, came forward to defend its share the cost rather than punish it. When this interest has been established and climate kidnapping, the multinational ridiculous stories at any time anywhere in the world staged hesco barrier